What about the argument, Mr. Borovoy, that would say that if you simply leave it to the Criminal Code, which you'll have to admit is a remedy that's been used very infrequently, you are in effect saying that the less drastic powers of the Human Rights Tribunal, which doesn't have powers to imprison people or take away their freedom of movement by incarcerating them, but simply has the ability to fine people, and obviously we hope will discourage conduct, but it's never been challenged on the grounds that it's criminal-type legislation.... What about the argument that in fact what you're doing thereby is perhaps forcing the authorities to use the Criminal Code more frequently than they otherwise would, instead of using an administrative tribunal, which you'd use less frequently?
I can't claim to be as articulate as you, Alan, but help me out here. You know what I'm trying to say: that you're going to end up using more drastic punishment, rather than less drastic punishment, by virtue of—