As an extremely guarded attitude towards international human rights instruments that deal with very specific issues, I think, and I would say most particularly gender. The most relevant political party, the Freedom and Justice Party, for instance, specifically cited in its campaign platform the convention on economic discrimination against women as a document that it was uncomfortable with.
I don't think it's an attempt to question international human rights standards across the board. As I say, especially in the political sphere, the brotherhood has accommodated itself to those, but I think especially when you get into the issue of gender relations, that's when they begin to get very suspicious and start looking at the fine print.
The fact is that Islamic personal status law is a gendered law. You have different rights according to whether or not you are male or female. That is something that is very hard for them to get around, and something that they regard as based on divine instruction, and not the sort of thing that the United Nations should be telling them not to do.