Not at all. In fact, we made statements so that it didn't affect it.
Mr. Shin, in the manner of the North American media, was created a kind of poster boy and sort of celebrity. This tends to happen in some parts of the world, but so far as the commission of inquiry was concerned, he was just another witness.
North Korea has constantly rejected the suggestion that there are detention camps, but we had objective evidence. We had satellite images, some of them provided to us through defence satellites, but most of them just through Google Earth. You can google the coordinates of where the prison camps are said to be and all of the paraphernalia and the descriptions that are given by the witnesses are borne out by just going down with very high accuracy to the places where the prison camps are.
There is objective testimony of the existence of prison camps. There is some evidence of relocation of people, and perhaps the closure of some prison camps, but we are not convinced. The commission of inquiry was not convinced that was a result of a policy of scaling down the prison camps but rather the redistribution of people within the prison camps that already exist.
But let there be no doubt that there are detention prison camps outside the ordinary justice system of North Korea where very large numbers of people and their families are kept because of their political views and where many are starved to death in conditions of barbarity.