I think those are excellent starting points. From a women human rights defender perspective, it's a complicated question, but the rule of law and justice come up time and time again. For example, Canada's support for the CICIG, an anti-corruption, anti-impunity body in Guatemala, is seen by many women human rights defenders and organizations as an important way for a donor country to support ongoing justice efforts in a situation where there is a failed state and failure to respond to the very real justice needs of local communities.
That's just one example of providing stability for women human rights defenders, long-term core funding and stability for women's movements, which are often the backbone and are responding when individual defenders are at risk. The trend now is toward regional networks, which provide safety and relocation for individual women defenders when they are at risk. Say somebody is at risk in Nicaragua. They might be relocated to Mexico for relief to get out of immediate danger and are provided some support and then brought back to the country when necessary.
For other defenders, for example in conflict countries—as you know, the average conflict is now seven to 15 years long—temporary relocation is no longer an option. Permanent relocation is much more necessary. Obviously, donor countries and countries like Canada can be helpful in looking at women human rights defenders as a category of refugees. The issue is, how are we providing and supporting defenders who essentially need permanent relocation?