In the case of Venezuela, I would say that the result is fairly positive. We don't have time to discuss the broader issue of the Internet's role in press freedom. However, Twitter is playing a fundamental role in the current crisis in Venezuela. Twitter is one of the few tools where people can find information provided by opposition and independent media, which aren't aligned with President Maduro. Since this media can't use the regular channels, which are systematically censored by the Maduro regime, they use Twitter—more than Facebook. To find information about Venezuela quickly, I use Twitter a great deal. It's one of the few sources of information available and it therefore plays a key role.
However, we've noticed that the government is beginning to see Twitter, Instagram, Facebook and social networks in general as a threat. Last week, Internet access was strangely cut off in several parts of Venezuela, and access to platforms such as Twitter and Instagram was restricted. The government has a monopoly or at least control over the infrastructure that provides access to high-speed Internet in the country, and it sees the social networks as a threat. When too much dangerous information or [Technical difficulty—Editor] is posted on these networks, the government will censor the networks directly by cutting off access to the Internet or the platforms.
In general—