I think the key word in your intervention is “road map”. The government of Haiti has asked Canada—well, the UN asked Canad—to take leadership with a military intervention in Haiti. In fact, I believe Canada has already taken that leadership. The thing is that Canada has not made, up until this very moment, any kind of proposal, any road map, so people don't know what stand we are talking about.
As for military intervention, of course I agree with other intervenants on this. Military intervention has never had any kind of positive response, not only in Haiti but in Libya, Afghanistan and Iraq as well. It's obvious to all of us.
The situation in Haiti right now, we have to agree, is not acceptable, but, at the same time, getting rid of gangs is not a solution in itself. It's getting rid of conditions that make people get into gangs. The road map or whatever Canada has to put as a proposal has to help prevent this kind of situation happening again; otherwise, Canada is going to go in with allies for six months, and six months later there will be gangs again.
I think the road map is what we should be discussing, not who can handle it. At the same time, I'd like to emphasize what I have said already: There is no government in Haiti right now. There is no government; there is no state of law. We need to come up with a global solution— not one thing, which would be a military intervention.