I didn't understand the question.
I will say that a number of rights groups in Uganda that specifically focus on promoting LGBT rights had a lot of challenges and continue to have a lot of challenges with receiving funding. That has obviously escalated over the last year and a half with the changes in funding practices by major international actors. What we call for is that the nature of funding take recognition of the specific needs that LGBT rights groups face and the conditions that they face.
A very specific and concrete example is to be able to provide funding for local LGBT rights groups to do online work. In the context of Uganda, many of them are not able to operate out of offices because of the climate that exists there, so I think the nature of funding has to shift in order to enable LGBT rights groups to do the important work that they are able to do in-country.