Yes, I do, thank you. Following up on what Mr. McCreery just said, when you look at the domestic support currently provided by the United States--we'll take corn as the example he just used. The United States has said they will reduce their amber support, but they will have a fairly significant ability to continue to provide that.
They target five commodities very directly for most of their amber support.
The WTO position is they will reduce that substantially, but they want to have unlimited ability to continue to provide green support. They want to have some blue box support, and they want a peace clause that says you don't get to target us; you don't get to target the way we provide our green support. So you take the amber support as sufficient to tell producers what to grow. Then you use blue support and green support to help them do it in a similar fashion to what they currently do. You have the ability then to get market access for the Americans to continue to stuff subsidized product into those markets. And without a better strategy from a Canadian perspective, we didn't win.
We need, absolutely, to be able to win this round, because Canadian producers are as damaged as they can tolerate from this ongoing strategy of American subsidization. We're trying to compete with it, but without that same kind of protection. We've got to be better than what we have been.