All those in favour that this motion made by Monsieur Paquette that the chair's ruling be sustained....
I've been informed by the clerk that this is the appropriate language if you are challenging a decision of the chair. You would be putting it in the affirmative that you uphold the decision of the chair. If you vote in favour of this, that means that you're not in favour of challenging the decision of the chair.
The question is that the chair's ruling be sustained.
Let's see a show of hands on the question that the chair's ruling be sustained. Those opposed?
Okay. The chair's decision has been successfully challenged.
Mr. Paquette, you can move forward with the motion of non-confidence in the chair at this time.