Mr. Chairman, the honourable member is characterizing this as the end of the lumber dispute. We're very much of the view that this would be the start of the next lumber dispute and that we would be back in four years with rates that were put forward without evidence, that we would be back in four years in a market that will be much worse than we were in four years ago, and that in fact the alternative would be higher rates. Yes, we would in fact, if we followed out today's litigation, be entitled to our deposits back. The question is, what did we buy with the $500 million? We bought the package, which includes all of the elements of it.
So our view is that we bought this period of peace in which we can develop something further and hopefully use it as a bridge to a North American market.