Well, what we have told the industry is to examine carefully the choices here, the choices between continuing litigation and a world in which government support may well be forthcoming but will almost certainly be countervailed. There's almost no chance that the Americans will not countervail any program to provide long-term support for the industry. So everybody just has to understand what the options are--litigation, possibly government support, but a long, extended period of uncertainty, with new measures that they can target in terms of countervailing duties, because you're going to put in some new measures of support.
On anti-circumvention and the B.C. forest policy changes, I've had extensive discussions with Premier Campbell and Minister Coleman in B.C. We are working with the embassy, with International Trade Canada, with U.S. Commerce, and with the U.S. trade representative's office on the changes that B.C. wanted to put in place for implementation in September. We believe those policy changes will be found acceptable as part of this agreement and therefore not a problem.
As Minister Coleman said, this is really the final installment of the major changes they began to put in place four or five years ago, partly in response to trade actions in the past, but also in response to the need to have a much more market-based way of valuing crown timber.