I think that's essentially correct. I mean, there are infractions of labour law in virtually any jurisdiction that you might care to look at closely. That's why you have enforcement mechanisms.
The broader point we would make is that if one is going to accept the proposition--and I think we're getting to the point where we have to accept the proposition--that capital and corporations are going to act transnationally, then we need to look at meaningful ways that labour rights can be enforced transnationally as well. That's essentially it.
Thus far an enormous amount of attention has been paid to giving transnational capital and corporations rights across borders, but very little attention has been paid to actually making sure that workers, who of course aren't as mobile as capital, can work on at least some even playing field, and that, as Nick said, there isn't this perverse race to the bottom, where countries seek a competitive advantage by not protecting the most basic labour rights for their workers.
That's how I'd put that.