My point of order, Mr. Chair, is that you're telling us after the fact. You did not tell us before the debate actually began on NDP-1 that you were going to move to have the two amendments considered consequentially. If that's the case then, my point is that we need the opportunity to debate NDP-2.
I would like to speak to that motion. The two are separate motions in our book, and you mentioned the consequentiality after Mr. Cannan's motion.
I will say, Mr. Chair, you're doing a very good job under difficult circumstances.