I wouldn't mind responding to the second one, the issue of a rush to get a deal. I was quoted by a journalist a few weeks ago that I thought it would be a herculean task to get this thing done by June, which I know was a stated target by some.
I believe the government does need to maintain a sense of urgency to get this deal done, now that the framework is done. Momentum is important in getting the deal done, because you get people on both sides agreeing to principles that they're maybe not 100% comfortable with—and there is some compromise on the American side here. That being said, we should not compromise the quality of the deal to get it done quickly. As I said, we need a sense of urgency, but not at the expense of getting a bad deal.