So, let me move to another question. No one can oppose the suggestion to try to invite witnesses who take different positions, some in favour of a proposal and others against. Ideally, all points of view should be expressed, and sometimes, we should hear not just from two opposing positions but from a range of positions. Given that proposals made by the government often do not find universal acceptance, we should not hold it against the government if it cannot maintain the balance between pro and con. What counts is the intent, and I do not want us to feel locked into an exact balance between two possibly divergent positions. We must also be ready to welcome witnesses who want to meet us.
On May 15th, 2007. See this statement in context.