Thank you.
I'd just like to speak against this motion and to my Liberal colleagues, not only because I don't think it's clearly outlined but also because similar motions have been put forward at another three committees right now. I don't think it hurts us to delay at this point. They've got a similar motion in front of the natural resources committee, a similar motion in front of the industry committee, a similar motion in front of the finance committee.
My suggestion is, if they're going to debate that in the finance committee, let them do that, and let's hear what happens, because all we're doing is going in this parallel universe where basically the same motion is being put forward in four different committees. So my suggestion to the Liberals is it's not clearly outlined what those definitive things are, so it won't hurt us to delay this for a period of time and find out what the finance committee comes up with. That would be my suggestion, because now we're going to debate this motion, just like the finance committee, just like the natural resource committee, just like the industry committee, and waste all our time here when we've got work to do with Korea. It doesn't mean that if you're not happy with what happens in the finance committee we can't deal with this another time.
So that's my recommendation for putting a fork in this thing today so we can move on.