Thank you.
Let me put in context why it's largely a generation one agreement. This agreement stems back to 1998, and it was one of the early free trade agreements that were made at the time, so there was an extended period. I think I'm the seventh or eighth chief negotiator, so this has a long history along the way. There may be instances where I just may not be aware of some of the details here.
At the time this was started, I think the parties involved had decided that, given the lay of the land at the time, we would make an effort to have a goods-only treaty with areas around it. My understanding is that it was felt that, for either side, it was not worth pursuing the services and investment at the time. Fast-forward a few years and we hit a road jam, and the negotiations lay dormant for quite some time as we were looking for ways to proceed. In the second half of 2006, we were continuing to talk, because this was an ongoing bilateral issue with us and the four parties--