I'd answer your question in two ways.
First, I think when you're talking about a free trade agreement between a Canadian state and a Colombian state, the interests of the Canadian government in pursuing the trade agreement have a broader impact and a broader meaning than simply the effect it may or may not have on Canadian resource extraction companies in Colombia.
Second, you are absolutely correct. As I sit here today, I am not aware of any egregious human rights violations that have occurred in the context of Canadian companies operating in Colombia. I don't know if that is because Canadian investment in Colombia is a relatively recent phenomenon or a smaller phenomenon, but there are a litany of examples--and I'd be happy to review them with you in some detail--whereby American companies investing in Colombia have been the subject of innumerable lawsuits in the United States over the egregious murders of trade unionists in their workplaces.
I'll give you an example. I believe Penamco was a company bottling Coca-Cola in Colombia. The president of the trade union in that workplace was assassinated in the workplace by paramilitaries, and that has become the subject of extensive litigation in the United States.
I would like to think, as I'm sure you would, that Canadian companies are more committed to social responsibility than other companies. I don't know the answer to that. As I said, we don't necessarily take a position on that issue. But it's not clear to me that this particular trade agreement being considered by the Government of Canada will necessarily have much to say about corporate social responsibility.