We may or may not have had a steering committee in the past. To address this, we have the motion on the floor right now, and I just want to give an indication of where we've been.
I don't know if we even did set up a steering committee last time around. I found we didn't really need one. On many of the matters that were going to be discussed, whether it was agenda or matters normally discussed at a subcommittee—if that was your intent, Mr. Julian, to discuss agenda or future business of the committee, or whatever—I found that we were generally able to receive consensus around the table and allow everybody's input into establishing those things and we didn't really need a subcommittee. Rather than have a subcommittee, we let the whole committee decide these matters in open consideration.
I just add that. That's the reason we didn't, and that's the reason I didn't include one today, because we didn't seem to need one in the past. But we have a motion on the floor and we'll welcome speakers to debate whether we want to have a steering committee and whether it should be formed in the manner proposed by Mr. Julian.
I had Mr. Keddy, Mr. Allison, Mr. Cannis, and Mr. Cardin on the previous list. We will now have a new list based on Mr. Julian's motion.
Did you want to speak to the motion?