I just want some clarity. I thank you for that. I agree very much with what you've said, that it's been a very collegial approach and that it works when we have some consultation beforehand. I just like to avoid surprises, because it's not in the interest of anybody on the committee or of witnesses to have surprise dilatory motions delay the work of the committee.
So that was the intent here. I want to be clear, though, that this is not in any way suggested to limit debate. It's just about the notice of motion of debate, to get it on the table; that's the concern I had. You can debate it again at the next meeting, if the committee so desires. That was the reason for it in this instance; it's just for clarity. I don't mean to change the tenor of the debate here. I just want to clarify where we are.
The next on the speakers list is Mr. Cannis.