To clarify, I don't think I said that the loss of profits would be fair game. I think I said the opposite, in fact.
To be clear, the annex is an integral part of the treaty. As a matter of law, it's part of the treaty. The annex was included, as I mentioned earlier, I believe, to elaborate on the considerations that a tribunal would have to take into account and that an investor would have to establish in order to make a claim for indirect expropriation. It was building on experience that Canada and other countries have had under investment arbitration over the past, roughly, 15 years.