As long as it's not over five minutes, right?
Welcome to all of our witnesses today, and certainly to Mr. Risser.
Karl, I appreciate the fact that you're a third-generation shipbuilder. In the real world, I was a fifth-generation farmer. It's quite important to have both feet on the ground. You and a number of your union workers are constituents of mine, so I appreciate your point of view. At the same time, I also appreciate Mr. Cannis' point of view and other comments that have been made.
We have a situation here...and I'm going to make a comment. We ran our yards for years--I know a little bit about our shipyards in Canada, as I spent a decade of my life in the offshore, on oil rigs and supply vessels--at 50%, with protection. During that period of time, you're absolutely right, we didn't have a shipbuilding policy. So we've embarked upon free trade agreements with other nations around the world to get our dependency away from 80% trade with the United States.
We have tried to assess the impact on shipbuilding. A number of the things you asked for are in it. We put another $50 million into structured finance. We allowed the accelerated capital cost allowance to be applicable. We brought out, for the first time in decades, a shipbuilding policy for procurement in Canada--the total, $43 billion. Two contracts have been let so far--one for $351 million, to Washington Marine Group in British Columbia, and one for $549 million, to the Irving shipyard. And there are more contracts to come.
I don't disagree with your comments on sovereignty. I think there's a real case to be made for sovereignty in the shipbuilding industry for our own procurement. But what I'm trying to point out, on a number of the issues you've talked about, is that we've done them. Now, maybe we haven't gone far enough to suit you, but I think we've gone more than three-quarters of the way, and 100% of the way on some of them.
So you have this issue where we have protection on tariff for 15 years, the longest protection we've ever negotiated for any trade agreement in the history of Canada. We have ten years of protection on less sensitive products and three years of total protection, within that 15-year block of time.
You know, if you look at sovereignty, well, that's procurement. We've protected government procurement. You look at an industry that has to have time to compete. Up until a few years ago, the Norwegians, for instance, did have an advantage. Well, three or four years ago they ended their subsidies. Now we have three years of subsidies going in. They had a lot longer time than that, I understand that, and I'm not disagreeing with you. But we can't do anything about that. That's something that should have happened 20 or 30 years ago that didn't happen.
All we can do is protect what we have today, move forward in a progressive manner, and offer jobs and opportunities. Right now we have our shipyards--I have to say this--working at 40% or 50%. We still have protection for them, and we have all these government contracts. So I would think that they would be able to adapt with this 15 years of protection that's in there.
I agree with you 100% that our shipyard workers are some of the best in the world, without question, and I've said this in the House. When all the other parties have been saying that we should be bringing in protectionist measures, I've been saying that we can compete anywhere, anytime, but we have to get to that point. We're there now. This free trade agreement has been negotiated. We've heard witnesses on it. We've had lengthy discussions. Sooner or later, we have to move forward.
If I have any time left, I now have a question.