All right. Talking about subsidies, I noticed some concern about possible subsidies that may or may not continue. Under a free trade agreement such as EFTA, there are, I imagine, dispute resolution mechanisms that can be triggered in the event that one country that is part of a free trade agreement wants to challenge or make a complaint. There's a mechanism within EFTA to do that, just as there is in the softwood lumber agreement, with which I'm very familiar. There's a dispute mechanism in there that can be triggered at any time by either country.
So that's the disincentive to trying to fudge on the agreement through subsidies or any direct monetary assistance to the industry.
I guess what Mr. Risser was talking about was that in the same way Canada, from a technology point of view and an efficiency point of view, in, say, softwood lumber, leads the world, in your opinion in technology and efficiency we're somewhat lagging behind . So if we were able to update that technology to become more competitive in that particular respect, probably some of the other issues, like the taxation issues, might not loom as important. Is that what you're saying?