We have always said, whether it is in the context of the ongoing trade relationship or any proposed change of that trading relationship, get clear about the human rights impact and make sure those are fully understood and addressed before we deepen that trading relationship. That's all we're looking for here.
With respect to what has happened over the course of this year with respect to the awful scandal regarding the eavesdropping and surveillance that the DAS bodyguards were carrying out with respect to human rights defenders, it's true, the government is responding and responding quickly. And we don't disagree with Margaret Sekaggya's comments, and others, that this hopefully means that we are moving in the right direction. It remains shocking and unacceptable that the civilian intelligence agency that reports to the president in Colombia has, for the last eight years, been carrying out that activity. It's one more indication of the fact that there is often a lot of smoke and mirrors going on with respect to what we're told as reality in Colombia and what is really happening behind the scenes with respect to human rights.
Lastly, about security being better or not, I think in large part that depends on where you stand in Colombia. I think it's clear in the cities for many urban dwellers that security has improved, although there's even debate back and forth about that. Take it outside the cities, and I think that's where the real concerns lie. That's where a lot of the impact of deeper trade and investment would be felt.