Why do you disagree with Mr. Mejia's study? I want you to explain, because Mr. Mejia practically had us convinced of the miraculous findings of his study. Why do you have doubts? Why do disagree with him? He was not very happy when we tried to criticize his methodology. So there is something there. Could you elaborate and shed some light on the situation or give us some insight into Mr. Mejia's remarks to the members?
On November 26th, 2009. See this statement in context.