Absolutely. But if we determine—and I think there's some agreement between us here—that the drug wars are responsible for a lot of the violence, displacement, and abuse of human rights in Colombia, and if we accept that we currently have no influence on those, and with labour and environment agreements that are the most robust we've ever signed between two sovereign governments, how does a rules-based system that guides legitimate trade, number one, and, secondly, the growth of legitimate trade, which offers the poor and underprivileged in Colombian communities an option to make a living outside of the drug trade, have the capacity to make things worse? I'm trying to understand.
I share with you and your organization the belief that we must work to make things better, but I'm trying to understand how legitimate trade with a rules-based system could make things worse.