First of all, on the percentages, in Colombia last year they killed approximately 40 unionists. And 40 unionists among 800,000 gives you six in 100,000, whereas the civil society, taking into account....
In any case, what I wanted to say was that violence against the unionists is lower than the normal rate. The normal rate is 33 among 100,000, whereas for union members it's six per 100,000. That's why I have two groups: the normal group, which is everybody, and then the unionists. That's how I came up with these figures.
As far as what you've said about the representation, it's very simple. The opposition in Colombia is headed up by the Polo Democrático, which, among other things, is the party that is with CUT. CUT belongs to that party. And in that country, in the elections for Congress, Polo Democrático used as a banner free trade agreements, and they were overthrown. They were visibly overthrown.
That's why I repeat that if people in Colombia were against free trade agreements, then they would have voted en masse for the Polo Democrático, as that was their electoral banner. In Colombia, workers are in favour of free trade agreements. If this were not the case, then they would not only be the leaders of the country but also have the presidency of the republic, because it was clearly established in the political debate that took place who was in favour of the free trade agreement and who was not. That was the political banner.
That's why we say that we represent the majority of the workers.