This agreement itself I don't think would have a tremendously huge impact on either of those things. The point I want to make is that it defers to the World Trade Organization in all of its major components. In the long run the real danger lies at the WTO. You could see that showdown come as early as this summer.
As I said, if you look in terms of wheat and durum, a small increase in durum to Norway, for example, could put some money in farmers' pockets, but again, that's because of the Wheat Board's efforts. On supply management, there's the issue of tariff quotas at the WTO, which I think is the big issue.
Under this agreement, of course, there was that cut of tariffs that fell within the quotas, which I thought set a precedent, but in the long run you can't really say that's a huge impact. I think looking at tariff rate cuts in the WTO will, in the long term, be much more of an impact.
This is actually more of a symbolic agreement in many ways. It shows that Canada is moving towards a free trade agenda by continually negotiating these bilaterals. By chipping away at our own food policy through these bilaterals it undermines our position at the WTO, and that's the real issue.