Before we continue, I just want to make a comment on Monsieur Laforest's comment with regard to a steering committee. We have been pretty informal about this because we weren't always able to include all the various points of view in a steering committee. With three on a committee and four parties, some were left out of those views, and sometimes it didn't work properly, or there wasn't the right balance. Again, we're starting a new year. I've always found it helpful to get it all out on the table and let people decide broadly whether or not... Those matters are usually discussed by subcommittees. It tends to take half the meeting every once in a while. Then we kind of understand how we got to where we are, and we do get a pretty good consensus.
I just wanted to put that back out there, and I thank you for raising it, Monsieur Laforest. If anybody has any other interest in that and wants to pursue having a subcommittee to meet outside, we're always open to that view. For the time being, I'd just as soon we did the first round anyway at the table to get a consensus.
We have Mr. Cannan, Mr. Holder, and Mr. Julian.
Mr. Cannan.