Yes. If I may, before I answer that, let me just say that Mr. Casey here works for an industry that's represented by the United Steelworkers, so we're here today understanding the kinds of things he's saying and the importance of products being sold elsewhere to help our members as well, notwithstanding our argument today. I just want to point that out.
The North American Free Trade Agreement had the language that protected so-called worker rights in side letters, outside the core text of the agreement, and by all rights, as far as what it has meant for workers goes, I think it has been a disaster. Not only have there been significant job losses and an exodus of jobs to Mexico in the first five years after the North American Free Trade Agreement as multinational corporations chased lower wages south of the U.S. border--not only from the U.S., but also from here--but it brought downward pressure on wages. With worker rights protections being in side letters and decided by tribunals and these kinds of things that were outside the scope of the agreement, it just didn't allow for real protection.
Again, the Jordan free trade agreement did allow for that, but it didn't work because it wasn't enforced. So not only does it need to be in the core text of the agreement--otherwise, you don't have any weight--but it also needs to be enforced. There are two pieces to that.