Thank you, Mr. Chair. Thank you, Mr. Clarke and Mr. Kneen.
Between the two of you, you've highlighted one of the best examples of the entire discussion about free trade, and that is whether you believe in the philosophy that free trade and increased engagement can be positive for the people in both countries involved, or whether you take a negative approach.
I have to say, Mr. Kneen, that I find the approach of Mr. Clarke and the work they're doing in Panama to be very positive in saying that this FTA would increase Canadian mining investment. Right off the bat, I think that's a really good thing, and I think that kind of investment can be even more positive for the residents of Panama.
Mr. Kneen, I want to ask you about understanding the concerns. This is not to take away from the legitimate concerns we all have about corporate social responsibility and environmental degradation. In the past, there has been significant abuse, and there may still be some, but in general, increased investment and engagement can help to build local capacity and increase awareness of the need for environmental protection.
We're trying to determine whether to approve this trade agreement. Do you believe that conditions for the people you've raised concerns about in Panama will be enhanced if Canada says no to this free trade agreement?