If we were to look at the Buy American agreement that we have in front of us, we have a 12-month period in which the Americans have agreed not to take any actions under the WTO government procurement agreement provisions. That provides some measure of breathing space as people adapt to it. Obviously they will have the same rates as Canadian companies would have to resort to dispute settlement if there were cases where they felt that unfair practices had been engaged. I don't imagine that would, in a circumstance like that, result in the infrastructure project not proceeding. A WTO process, of course—and Don may want to add to this—gives one certain remedies at the end of the day if your case is successful.
I think that some who dwell on these disputes ignore the fact that we have massive amounts of trade, literally millions of transactions that are never contested, that go very well between the countries. That's where our prosperity comes from. Two-thirds of our Canadian economy, as I said, is trade-related. When you weigh that against the number of cases where we have irritants or you have disputes that go to dispute resolution, it really is a very small case.
Did you want to add anything to that?
