No. I think grain is different that way in that it's not a living, breathing animal. Just the fact that people calve in the spring and the product has to be there before it's 21 months old means farmers just can't grow their animals quickly enough to be there on a timely basis.
On the grain side I would say one of the challenges would be segregation. For example, if a Quebec soybean grower wants to grow non-genetically modified beans for a very specific Japanese market, or a European market for that matter, and non-GM pays a premium price, one thing we have to have when we're dealing with these markets—since it's impossible to be at zero, because there may be one bean somewhere in the farmer's combine that fell in—is a low-level presence policy. In case there's an accident and just a minute amount of a genetically modified grain gets into that shipment—it could be corn or it could be soybean, and I'll use Quebec as an example—and goes all the way to Japan, we have to have some low-level presence policy that would allow that trade to continue without actually insisting that they have acceptance of GM food. That's probably one of the challenges we have, and it has to be part of the trade agreement.
So wherever possible there has to be a low-level presence policy to allow trade to continue.