Fair enough.
It's interesting because one of our colleagues opposite referenced E. coli and BSE. I know those issues have to go on the table, but I sure hope that it doesn't get blown out of proportion as it relates to Japan. What struck me were your comments about our inspection system, that our meat inspection system is at a higher standard than the Japanese one. I think you called it the floor model, or the basis of comparison. I find that those other comments, particularly in this context, aren't very helpful.
When Canada had a BSE problem, we declared it. We do not hide those kinds of issues. I'm told there are other countries where they just say to get a backhoe and fix the problem. Frankly, that's not Canada's way. If there's anything that this E. coli outbreak has shown, it's that when there's an issue, Canada will stand up and deal with it. I give credit to our inspection system and the declarations that need to be done. It ultimately gets done the right way. We don't believe in backhoes to bury our problems. Good on Canada for taking that approach.
Could you help me understand something? Mr. Price, you talked about the 20 months versus the 30 months limitation. Did I hear you say that Canada's not unique in that? In other words, do all countries go through that in dealing with Japan right now?