When I read that document there were some numbers in terms of goals or objectives, like doubling trade and things like that.
If you look at the data without an agreement, we have been doubling trade and we've increased trade a lot. It's hard to argue that the agreement itself is going to generate a big bang in trade. There's a very loose connection between a trade agreement and actual employment or jobs. One of the things you see a lot are comments that it's going to generate jobs. The economic evidence on job creation from trade agreements is that there's not a big employment effect—maybe in the short run, but not in the long run. There's potentially some economic growth effects and that kind of thing that in the longer term can translate into a stronger economy. On actual employment effects, it's fairly dubious to make arguments that it's going to generate jobs.
I don't know if I answered your question.