That is a great question, because every time we talk about India, Australia always seems to be the country that comes up in the discussion because of its population, the size, and all the rest.
I think a couple of things are very important when we raise a question like this. Obviously everyone will tell you about their proximity, which is true. Australia is very close to India and it is able to get things going in the Pacific, especially with Japan and all those countries over there, far better than Canada can because of our location.
More importantly, to do justice to the question I think we need to know what is in that $14 billion. That's critical. As you're aware, in 2010 the Prime Minister said that we would do $15 billion in trade by 2015 and yet we are only at $5.2 billion, as you correctly said. There is no road map, there is no blueprint, so it becomes very difficult for anyone to know what led to the $15 billion number being mentioned in the first place. With a road map, you would at least know where you went wrong and learn some of what we need to do next to make it happen.
From the same point of view, Australia's biggest advantage is that it started early in terms of real trade and because of their proximity, they are able to get much more trade with India.
Again, of the $14 billion I'd like to know how much is going which way, because that's also critical. I think Australia must be sending more to India than India is sending to it, because India is buying a lot of large stuff from Australia.