That's a very good question. I don't think we're at the stage of answering that.
As I said, there are two purposes or major objectives of the Pacific Alliance. Objective one is deeper integration among the members, and objective two is reaching out to the Pacific. Our approach to membership of this body, as it is with other bodies, is that if it is open to a liberal economy and meets 21st century trade standards, then we should be a viable member of such trade bodies—or trade-plus bodies, as the Pacific Alliance is. That's been our approach across a number of multilateral forums.
As you know, Asia has been a very important partner for us, and a market and a region where we have expanded significantly over the last while.
I can't say which specific Asian members would be welcome in the Pacific Alliance because we're not there yet, but I know that we're very supportive of our own enhanced engagement with Asia. It makes sense that those Asian members that are consistent and take the same approach as us to 21st century trade standards would be viable members.