I would say two quick things.
The first is, I would fundamentally disagree in assessing the health of an economy on the basis of a trade deficit. We are a country of 35 million; the EU has 500 million. They can make a lot more stuff than we can and we want to consume it. We have a choice. Consumers have choices: that's the beauty of our democracy, our economy. We can choose to consume those products or not. I am fully in favour of consumer choice. That really is, in essence, what trade provides.
Overall, our terms of trade for Canada—that means the difference between what we pay for imports and what the world pays us for our exports—have been incredibly healthy. We've enjoyed a great terms of trade run here over the last 15 years in Canada.
I would argue, if anything, we should take that focus that you have on the trade deficit and move it over into true challenges like our infrastructure challenge in terms of landing our energy assets in Asia. Right now, we are leaving $35 on the table for each barrel of gas because we are selling it at a discount into U.S. markets, and we can't land it in Asian markets where we would earn more money—