We have a lot of bilateral FTAs with countries with which we are also partners in the WTO. There's a principle that we use when we have overlapping commitments. One is that from a goods perspective, from a market access perspective, the most liberalizing regime can prevail. The exporter can take advantage of whichever rule is in place under whichever agreement that is most beneficial to that exporter. So in that sense, I guess “supersede” would be one way to put it.
In terms of disciplines—so the rules in the areas of state-owned enterprises or technical barriers to trade, or SPS, or what have you—there's a principle of coexistence. To the greatest extent possible, what we are trying to do, and I think succeeding in doing in the TPP, is establishing rules that simply build upon everything that we've done to date. They take what we've done to date and try to bump it up one step further to address concerns that have been raised with us by our businesses. Again, they should be able to coexist. Obviously, we'll have a very rigorous legal analysis at the end of the day and ensure that that's the case. If not, there are mechanisms by which we can make sure that everything fits together smoothly.