I think that all options would be open to us, because it would be a different configuration. We would define our interests in the bilateral context or in the regional context depending on the discussions being had at that table. I don't think by concluding a certain package bilaterally with Japan we would necessarily have to have the exact same package in the TPP, because the dynamics are different, the players are different, and what's on the table is different in some respects, and vice versa. So what we do and would always do is to try to get the best that we can in both fora, to advance as much as we can in our relationship with them and to integrate it as much as we can in both places. Those are the advantages, in fact, of being at the table for two initiatives with Japan.
On March 25th, 2014. See this statement in context.