I appreciate that.
When you bargain you can't necessarily just tip your hat. That's understood, including by the Canadian public, since we are your members, if you will, but you have to do that.
Ultimately, the other part of it is, and listening to the tail end of that comment about protecting from the supply management side—there are three pillars in supply management, as I know you know—so I'll take it from your last statement that you are talking about “that's the type of protection we would look at”, as well as other sectors, but I'm specifically homing in on this one.
Will it be our intention, or at least will it be our hope, that we protect the three pillars of supply management, not only through the entire negotiations, but as you've suggested, this is when it's done it's done, we take it all or none. Would this be something we would be looking at, to say this needs to still be there and intact when we get to the end, or is that a bargaining position that still...and I'll accept that. I understand that, Ms. Hillman, if it's a bargaining position we're still not quite clear yet.