We don't have any specific examples that we can cite here for the benefit of the committee today, but I think there is a hierarchical order whereby, if the Government of Canada is seeking a trade agreement with a global community or a country, for some of the basic issues that are being debated around human rights and social responsibility and such other major issues, there is almost a clearing house of orders. Are they a country we're prepared to do business with or not? If they are, then to use the mining example, one company will come, others will follow, and there will be a natural transgression of business in that country. But to put it on the back of the first company that wants to do business in that country, or one or two companies, is somewhat unwieldy for that individual company.
For example, if we pick a company in the world that we would like to do business with, should we sort out their political and social and economic situation, or should the Government of Canada first say that this is a country we're interested in dealing with?
I'm not sure it's fair to put on the backs of one or two companies the question of whether it is fair to do business in that country or any others.