But you just said yourself that most countries felt that the progressive side doesn't belong in trade agreements. For example, Australia says that, yes, it does a trade agreement, and it looks at the progressive side of things through its NGOs. It does it through NGO funding to make sure that it actually achieves the targets it set out to achieve.
Isn't that more of a preferential response to these types of situations, rather than holding your whole commerce at stake based on culture or—I don't want to say it's diminished anything—based on a political agenda of one party?