Thank you so much.
The economic impact analysis shows $4.2 billion in 22 years by 2030; $4.2 billion, ironically, is the amount of GDP that Canada generates every day. We're talking about one day over 22 years that we will have this agreement. I just want that on the record because I think it's interesting.
The second thing I'd like to talk about is this progressive element. We know the preamble is non-binding, regardless of the progressive elements that are referenced there. In the environment, the words “climate change” are not even used in the agreement. I don't know how that can be labelled progressive, to be quite honest, given our Paris commitments and where we need to go.
We agreed to maintain the original labour text that is based on the U.S. template, which has been proven ineffective in trade tribunals.
Canada knew this text was useless, but we didn't change it. Why did we not attempt to change it, and how on earth is this progressive?