We haven't seen the specifics of the U.S. proposal at this point. They have not tabled what would be called “the key feature”, which would be a market share arrangement.
That aside, the fundamental difference from what existed under the 2006 SLA, in which there was a choice between option A and option B, is that the U.S. proposal would offer only an option B approach, with a volume restriction. From the standpoint of British Columbia, certainly, and the other provinces that operated under the option A provision of the 2006 agreement, we do not believe that a volume restriction in isolation is a prudent approach to managing trade between the two countries, and so we are not in favour of that approach.