I couldn't quantify that off the top of my head, but the observation that I would make is that as we have fought the various iterations of the lumber dispute, we've lost sight of the fact that softwood lumber is in competition with other products that can be used for similar purposes.
Only through the 2006 SLA was the industry given the opportunity to work constructively to combat both the loss of market share to these other products and also to grow market in segments of the industry where we had historically not been well represented, through groups like the Binational Softwood Lumber Council and the Softwood Lumber Board.
I'm actively involved with both of those groups. I can tell you that the work that has been done has been absolutely tremendous, both in terms of stopping the loss of market share and actually growing the market.
Those of you from British Columbia will know that there's an 18-storey wooden building being constructed in Vancouver, and there are tall wood buildings being constructed in eastern Canada, the United States, and other markets. That's all the result of the constructive efforts to grow market, which I think is a much better focus for everyone's attention than fighting over market share that's being eroded by other products.