Thank you all.
It's good to have the CFIA here, because we have to talk about checking off that box before we get to what really is the problem. I think everybody has come to that conclusion: you have to deal with the science part of it and then eliminate that from the equation as quickly has possible so that you actually get to the true heart of the problem. If it's political, then that's what it is.
In checking those boxes, have we changed our processes in how we examine canola? Is there any way that you think they could have made a mistake in the process that could have created a problem with what we sent to China?
Absolutely not. Okay. We'll get that on the record.
Is there anything you've seen in the samples, when you re-looked at them, that said “Hey, this is a problem” or raised concerns that would be unusual compared to other samples you've had from other companies?