I do not have any specific studies myself, but thank you for the question.
We have looked at those studies in New Zealand and Australia. They're purely based on the notion that term extension will cost consumers because they'll continue to pay for physical products that would otherwise have gone into the public domain. But this is not the case because the market is moving toward a streaming model, a rental model, an online model. People are no longer buying physical products. In the future, they will probably not be buying them at all.
The reality is that these pieces of intellectual property will exist online forever and somebody will be monetizing them forever, however this will not be a Canadian anymore. It will be a Spotify, a Tidal, an Apple that will be exploiting those products online, selling them or reaping the benefit of them from Canadian consumers but not putting any of that money back into the Canadian economy.
That is the fatal flaw of those studies. They don't recognize that this is the way the model works. They assume that 20 years from now we'll still be going to a store where we'll be buying a CD or a physical product, and that things that would otherwise have gone into the public domain won't be free then. I'm sorry but this is just a false notion. That's not the way the world is working.