I think every negotiation is different. I think a plurilateral negotiation—a negotiation with many parties—has a lot of additional complexities. A bilateral negotiation is fairly straightforward. You know what you're looking for from the partner; they know what they're looking for from you, and you have a one-on-one conversation.
In a plurilateral negotiation, there's a matrix of interests at play. For example, there are many things that were very important and interesting to Canada, but we were talking about Japan earlier. Good market access into Japan and reduction of tariffs into Japan were important negotiating objectives for Canada. Other countries had negotiating objectives into Canada, but they weren't necessarily Japan. Some of the most difficult issues for us to negotiate were in the agriculture area, in relation to supply-managed products. I think everybody knows that. But it wasn't Japan that was interested in access to our dairy market; it was other countries.
You have a matrix of interests where you are looking to a partner for something, but someone else is looking to you. You may actually not have very many interests back into that country. So it's a complicated—