I have two separate thoughts. Renegotiation, I think, isn't on the table. I do think there are some side agreements to this deal that I'd like to see someone challenge. Those side agreements do things like deal with snap-backs and safeguards and tariff elimination schedules. You know, the premise for Canadian manufacturers, both small and medium-sized ones.... I represent all of them. You heard from a lot of large ones who said they were happy and they support the deal, but I want to parse what they're saying. They're saying they're getting access to new markets, and that they can find new customers and sell to them. But it's a GNP discussion, not a GDP discussion. If you're going to supply somebody who's assembling in Asia, you're going to assemble your parts in Asia.
The inverse in this deal is true. We are now opening the market for larger players to compete. They have mobile capital and economies of scale, and they can bid on products and bid on lines that the small and medium-sized single footprint companies that are healthy today will have to compete with. You can't argue one without the other. Even though some of the larger billion-dollar Canadian tier one companies are going to possibly benefit from getting new customers, they will benefit from getting those customers somewhere else, hiring people in other countries, and sourcing goods in those countries to make those parts to build those cars. That's where we are on this.